A probabilistic system cannot be verified by asking it what it did.
We evaluate agentic systems adversarially, against a deterministic ground truth that neither the agent nor the attack can reach — standardized, repeatable, with a published methodology.
What you get
Evidence your customers can check
Your customers’ security review wants evidence you didn’t produce yourself. An evaluation gives you that — and shows your team what to fix.
The attack surface
Every input your agent trusts, every action it can take, and the paths an adversary can take between them — mapped for the version you ship.
The evaluation
A standardized set of threat scenarios, extended for your agent’s environment. Each scenario runs repeatedly against a clean baseline, so every finding is reported with how often it occurs and the confidence behind it.
The setting
Your agent as you ship it, run in our hardened harness on copies of your artefacts — never on your production systems.
The report, for your team
Every finding with the evidence behind it: what failed, where and why — and what to change so it doesn’t happen again. A re-run confirms the fix.
The evaluation letter, for your customers
The short, shareable summary their security review asks for, bound to your agent’s version, the date and our methodology version — so your customers always know what was evaluated, and each new release can be measured against the last.
Latest research
Adversarial Assessment of Agentic Systems: A Deterministic-Ground-Truth Methodology, Demonstrated Across an Industrial Control Stack
Why a deceived agent and a deceiving one need different checks — and how an evaluation catches both.
Contact
For evaluation enquiries, research correspondence, or press: write to us directly.
Phaneia GmbH · Berlin